uncover 5 surprising truths Against Interpretation” was a provocative call to arms by Susan Sontag, a young critic and philosopher who would go on to become one of the most influential voices in American cultural commentary. Sontag’s essay was a reaction against the dominant critical approaches of her time, which she saw as overly reliant on interpretation and analysis. As she argued, “In place of a hermeneutics we need an erotics of art.”
Sontag’s central argument is that interpretation can be a form of intellectualization, a way of avoiding the raw emotional and sensory impact of a work of art. By over-analyzing and over-interpreting, we risk reducing the complexity and richness of art to a set of abstract concepts or intellectual constructs. This can lead to a kind of “transparency” – where the work of art becomes a mere window onto some deeper truth or meaning, rather than an experience in its own right.
The Risks of Over-Interpretation uncover 5 surprising truths
So, what’s the harm in interpretation, exactly? As Sontag notes, “To interpret is to impoverish, to deplete the world – in order to set up a shadow world of ‘meanings.'” When we over-interpret, we can end up missing the nuances and complexities of the artwork itself. For example, consider a viewer who walks into a modern art museum and sees a piece that appears to be simply a blank canvas. Their initial reaction might be confusion or dismissal, but as they stand there, they begin to notice the subtle texture of the canvas, the way the light falls on it, and the sense of anticipation that builds as they wait for something to happen. This is an experience that can’t be reduced to a simple interpretation or analysis.
“I went to see this installation and was completely baffled at first, but as I stood there, I started to feel this sense of unease, like I was being forced to confront my own expectations.” This kind of visceral response is exactly what Sontag is talking about – an experience that’s rooted in the body and the emotions, rather than just the intellect.
So, what’s the alternative to interpretation? Sontag’s answer is to focus on the sensory and emotional aspects of art, to cultivate a more direct and intuitive relationship with the work. This means paying attention to the way a piece makes us feel, the way it looks and sounds, and the way it challenges our expectations. As Sontag puts it, “We need to learn to see more, to hear more, to feel more.”
FAQs
What is the main argument of “Against Interpretation”?
The main argument is that interpretation can be a form of intellectualization that detracts from the raw emotional and sensory impact of a work of art.
Sontag’s ideas remain relevant today, as many modern art pieces continue to challenge our expectations and push the boundaries of interpretation.
What is an “erotics of art”?
An “erotics of art” refers to a more direct and intuitive relationship with art, one that focuses on the sensory and emotional aspects of the experience.
Can interpretation ever be useful?
While Sontag is critical of over-interpretation, interpretation can be useful in certain contexts – for example, when it helps to provide historical or cultural context for a work of art.
CONSOLATION
As we continue to navigate the complexities of modern art and culture, Sontag’s ideas offer a timely reminder to slow down, look closely, and experience art on its own terms. By doing so, we can cultivate a deeper appreciation for the ways in which art can challenge, provoke, and inspire us. Explore more of Susan Sontag’s work and discover the enduring power of her ideas.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE BLOG POSTS
Liam is a freelance writer, blogger, and digital media journalist. He has a management degree in Supply Chain & Operations Management and Marketing and boasts a wide-ranging background in digital media.